李嘉誠榮休 vs 退休

一代香江商界傳奇李嘉誠宣布自五月股東大會後退任主席一職,正式退下火線,成為全港所有報章的頭版新聞。香港人對李生印象兩極,有人佩服其經商的能力,亦有人不喜歡他的為富不仁。但我更相信李生是一名好人,最低限度沒有做過什麼傷害別人的事吧。因此,今日報章對他的報道都很客氣,當然少不免批評他營商手法等,但總體來說算是公允的報道。事實上,作為傳媒本來便應該如此,過份在報道吹捧便會來得不專業,我發現有報章用上榮休一字來形容李生,便發現有點不妥了,他是退休,公司也沒巿用榮休來形容他,但為什麼這份報章要用榮休呢?當然,他受得起榮休有餘,但作為傳媒客觀便可,毋須這樣擦鞋吧?是要回饋李生給他們廣告費嗎?但連兒子辦的報章被沒有這橏肉麻去用榮休入題,這份政協辦的報的編輯是不是忘了自己的身份呢?

Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post

Written by

A columnist in political development in Greater China region, technology and gadgets, media industry, parenting and other interesting topics.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store